Payload Information
General Information of This Payload
| Payload ID | PAY0VEFSG |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | CPT2 |
|||||
| Synonyms |
CPT2
Click to Show/Hide
|
|||||
| Target | DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) | |||||
Each Antibody-drug Conjugate Related to This Payload
Full Information of The Activity Data of The ADC(s) Related to This Payload
WO2024193682A1 32G1-8D9-CPT2 [Investigative]
Discovered Using Patient-derived Xenograft Model
| Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
54.50%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with gastric cancer patient-derived tumortissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPBG-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the gastric tumor fragments were 10.1 1% and 1.19%, respectively, When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. The mice werethen injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 35.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
| Experiment 2 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
80.20%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 19.54% and 8.31%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 3mg/kg ADC's by i.v, BIW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 32.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
| Experiment 3 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
84.30%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 31.01% and 76.96%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 25.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
PF06263507-CPT2 [Investigative]
Discovered Using Patient-derived Xenograft Model
| Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
57.90%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 19.54% and 8.31%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 3mg/kg ADC's by i.v, BIW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 32.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
WO2024193682A1 32G1-8H10-CPT2 [Investigative]
Discovered Using Patient-derived Xenograft Model
| Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
63.10%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with gastric cancer patient-derived tumortissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPBG-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the gastric tumor fragments were 10.1 1% and 1.19%, respectively, When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. The mice werethen injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 35.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
| Experiment 2 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
80.40%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 31.01% and 76.96%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 25.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
| Experiment 3 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
90.90%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 19.54% and 8.31%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 3mg/kg ADC's by i.v, BIW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 32.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
| Experiment 4 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
91.50%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 58.86% and 24.08%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 150-200 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 25.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
WO2024193682A1 32G1-CPT2 [Investigative]
Discovered Using Patient-derived Xenograft Model
| Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
72.10%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 31.01% and 76.96%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 25.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
WO2024193682A1 2F11-CPT2 [Investigative]
Discovered Using Patient-derived Xenograft Model
| Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
78.50%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 31.01% and 76.96%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 25.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
Telisotuzumab-CPT2 [Investigative]
Discovered Using Patient-derived Xenograft Model
| Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
79.80%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 58.86% and 24.08%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 150-200 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 25.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
WO2024193682A1 32G1-2F11-CPT2 [Investigative]
Discovered Using Patient-derived Xenograft Model
| Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
80.80%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with gastric cancer patient-derived tumortissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPBG-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the gastric tumor fragments were 10.1 1% and 1.19%, respectively, When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. The mice werethen injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 35.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
| Experiment 2 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
86.70%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 19.54% and 8.31%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 3mg/kg ADC's by i.v, BIW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 32.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
| Experiment 3 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
90.50%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 31.01% and 76.96%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 200-300mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 25.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
| Experiment 4 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
92.50%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 58.86% and 24.08%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 150-200 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 25.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
SYD-1875-CPT2 [Investigative]
Discovered Using Patient-derived Xenograft Model
| Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Date of This ADC | [1] | ||||
| Efficacy Data | Tumor Growth lnhibition value (TGl) |
85.40%
|
|||
| Method Description |
B-NDG mice were engrafted in the right flank with pancreatic cancer patient-derivedtumor tissue fragments (2 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm). The immunofluorescence staining results showed that TPGB-positive cells and MET-positive cells in the pancreatic tumor fragments were 58.86% and 24.08%, respectively. When the tumors in the mice reached a volume of about 150-200 mm3, the mice were randomly placed into different groups based on the tumor volume. Themice were then injected with 6mg/kg ADC's by i.v, QW, administration. Determined tumor volume after the experiment, measured at day 25.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| In Vivo Model | Patient-derived Xenograft B-NDG mice Model | ||||
